Skip to main content
  • EN

Building on our discussions about traffic steering and the powerful Netskope Client, let's explore how to unlock the true potential of your Netskope SASE platform: achieving granular visibility.

Deep visibility is built upon several layers of context, each with critical dependencies. Understanding these layers is key to extracting maximum value, enabling precise policy enforcement, and contributing directly to your organization's robust security and compliance posture.

  • User, Group, and Organizational Unit (OU) Information:

    • Value: This foundational context is paramount for establishing Identity-Centric Zero Trust. By knowing who is accessing resources, it enables explicit trust decisions, precise role-based access controls (RBAC), and granular auditing, aligning with the "never trust, always verify" principle.

    • Compliance Reference: Essential for meeting NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) Identify Function (ID.AM) - Access Management and ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.9 (Access Control), foundational for GDPR accountability and least privilege principles.

    • Gartner Context: Gartner consistently emphasizes identity as a primary control plane for Zero Trust architectures. This principle is widely discussed in Gartner's public-facing materials and definitions of ZTNA, which forms a core part of the broader Zero Trust strategy.

    • Key Dependency: Integration with your identity source (e.g., SCIM with Identity Providers (IDPs) or AD Importer for legacy infrastructures).

  • Device Risk and Device Information:

    • Value: Enables Conditional Access and Risk-Adaptive Policies, allowing security postures to dynamically adjust based on device health and compliance. This strengthens endpoint security and reduces attack surface by ensuring only trusted and compliant devices access resources.

    • Compliance Reference: Directly supports NIST SP 800-207 (Zero Trust Architecture), specifically the "assess security posture of all enterprise assets" principle, and ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.8 (Asset Management) and A.9 (Access Control).

    • Gartner Context: Gartner's public discussions on Zero Trust consistently underscore device posture assessment as a key factor in dynamic access decisions.

    • Key Dependencies for Complete Visibility:

      • Asset Management Systems: Netskope data, which provides visibility into traffic from covered devices, can be sent to your Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system. From the SIEM, this data can be joined with your existing asset management system (e.g., CMDB) data. This powerful correlation provides the complete "Total Available Market" of systems within your environment, critical for understanding the full scope of devices that can be covered.

      • Deployment Capabilities: Client deployment is typically facilitated by purpose-built solutions like SCCM, JAMF, or Mobile Device Management (MDM) platforms. Netskope observes what is covered, but relies on these external systems to extend coverage. This allows organizations to measure "Risk Coverage" against their total environment, which is crucial for comprehensive security reporting.

      • Netskope's Role: While Netskope provides deep visibility into traffic from covered devices, enabling granular policy enforcement, it relies on the correlation of its data with adjacent systems (via SIEM) to help CISOs and boards answer the critical question of "how much of my environment is Netskope truly covering?" relative to all corporate assets.

  • URL Categorization:

    • Value: Provides foundational Web Filtering and enforcement of Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs). It's a fundamental initial layer of defense against known malicious or inappropriate websites, integral to a Zero Trust approach by segmenting access to internet destinations.

    • Compliance Reference: Supports general security hygiene required by frameworks like PCI DSS Requirement 1.1.6 (securing systems) and ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.13 (Information Filtering).

    • Gartner Context: As a core component of the Secure Web Gateway (SWG), it's foundational to SASE. Gartner's definition of SSE (Security Service Edge) explicitly includes SWG capabilities.

    • Visibility: Native to Netskope SWG.

    • Customization: Option to ingest custom URL lists via API and define custom categories.

  • Application Risk (Cloud Confidence Index - CCI):

    • Value: Empowers informed decision-making on cloud application adoption by classifying "Shadow IT" and assessing risk across thousands of apps. This aligns with Zero Trust by ensuring explicit trust is granted only to applications meeting defined risk criteria, reducing cloud exposure.

    • Compliance Reference: Aids in ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.12.6 (Control of Cloud Services) for risk assessment, and informs GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) by identifying risky data processing.

    • Gartner Context: Gartner publicly discusses Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) as critical for governing cloud usage and assessing application risk. The Cloud Confidence Index (CCI) aligns with the need for clear risk visibility in a Zero Trust environment.

    • Visibility: Provided by Netskope's CCI engine, visible directly in the UI.

  • Application-Based Visibility (App Discovery & Differentiation):

    • Value: Enables Deep Traffic Inspection to unmask hidden threats and data movement within specific applications. Crucial for differentiating between services sharing common infrastructure (e.g., AWS, Azure) and applying least-privilege access at the application layer, a cornerstone of Zero Trust.

    • Crucial Dependency: SSL Decryption. This is vital for:

      • Differentiating granular application use within shared IPs.

      • Extracting URI information for discrete application mappings, leveraging specific APIs.

    • Compliance Reference: Essential for NIST SP 800-53 Control SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) for inspecting encrypted traffic, and advanced PCI DSS Requirement 4.1.

    • Gartner Context: Gartner consistently highlights SSL/TLS decryption as a necessary capability for full visibility and threat detection within modern security stacks like SASE and NG-SWG.

  • Application Instance Detection:

    • Value: Provides crucial Data Separation and Control, preventing sensitive corporate data from exfiltrating to personal instances of cloud applications. This enforces corporate usage and maintains strict data perimeter control, a key tenet of Zero Trust data protection.

    • Compliance Reference: Directly supports GDPR data minimization and purpose limitation principles (Article 5), and HIPAA data separation requirements (45 CFR Part 164).

    • Gartner Context: Instance awareness is a foundational CASB capability widely discussed by Gartner as essential for managing enterprise data sprawl and ensuring data-centric Zero Trust policies.

  • Application Activity Detection:

    • Value: Enables Granular Policy Enforcement and Insider Threat Detection by monitoring specific user actions within applications (e.g., "upload," "download," "share," "delete"). This provides the continuous monitoring and verification essential for Zero Trust, extending control beyond simple access.

    • Compliance Reference: Aligns with NIST SP 800-53 Control AU-2 (Audit Events) and AU-12 (Audit Generation) for logging and audit generation, and ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.12.4 (Logging and Monitoring) for recording activity.

    • Gartner Context: Gartner frequently highlights the criticality of granular activity detection within applications. They emphasize that not all actions carry the same risk (e.g., viewing a document versus sharing it externally). This deep visibility is crucial for applying fine-grained, risk-adaptive policies and effectively detecting anomalous or malicious insider behavior, which is fundamental to Zero Trust's continuous verification.

    • Visibility: Offers varying levels of granularity for many applications.

  • User Risk-Based Visibility (UEBA):

    • Value: Provides Proactive Threat Detection and identifies anomalous user behavior, indicating potential compromised accounts, insider threats, or high-risk activity. This allows for adaptive, real-time trust decisions, a core principle of Zero Trust.

    • Compliance Reference: Supports NIST SP 800-53 Control RA-3 (Risk Assessment) and AU-6 (Audit Review, Analysis, and Reporting), and ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.12.6 (Event Management).

    • Gartner Context: Gartner increasingly integrates UEBA capabilities into SASE platforms to provide continuous, dynamic risk assessment, driving real-time Zero Trust policy enforcement.

  • Data Risk (Leveraging Data Loss Prevention - DLP):

    • Value: Critical for Data Protection and Compliance Enforcement, preventing sensitive data loss and intellectual property theft across all egress points. This embodies the Zero Trust principle of protecting the resource (data) directly, regardless of location or user.

    • Key Dependency: A mature Data Governance Program. To maximize DLP value and achieve precise detections, your organization must clearly define:

      • Where sensitive data resides.

      • What constitutes sensitive data for your organization.

      • What sensitive data patterns look like.

      • This prevents reliance on generic indicators and ensures DLP policies are precisely tailored.

    • Compliance Reference: Absolutely essential for adhering to regulations like GDPR (Article 32 - Security of Processing), HIPAA (e.g., 45 CFR § 164.312(c) - Integrity), PCI DSS Requirement 3 (Protect Stored Cardholder Data), CCPA, and ISO 27001 Annex A Control A.15 (Supplier Relationships) and A.18 (Compliance).

    • Gartner Context: DLP is consistently cited by Gartner as a foundational security service within the SASE model, essential for enforcing data-centric Zero Trust principles.

  • Policy Action Context:

    • Value: Ensures Effective, Adaptive Enforcement of security policies, enabling precise responses (allow, block, justify) based on rich, real-time context. This directly embodies the "never trust, always verify" and adaptive access principles of Zero Trust.

    • Key Dependency: Policies should always be based on established corporate guidelines to ensure clear and consistent enforcement and auditability.

    • Compliance Reference: All major compliance frameworks mandate strong, auditable policy enforcement as a critical control (e.g., NIST SP 800-53 Control PM-9 - Policy and Procedures, ISO 27001 Clause 5.1 - Information Security Policies).

By systematically building and leveraging these layers of context, organizations can achieve a profound understanding of their digital environment, enabling precise security enforcement, meeting critical compliance requirements, and extracting maximum value from their Netskope SASE platform, all within a robust Zero Trust framework.

Next, we'll dive into the Inline Adoption Funnel – a structured approach to progressively implementing Netskope's security capabilities!

Be the first to reply!

Reply


Badges Winner

Show all badges

Not finding what you're looking for?

Don't be shy and let us know about your challenge.

Ask your question here!
Terms & ConditionsCookie settings