Product Forums

Hi Community,Does anyone know how to make the Google Antigravity Certificate Pinned App exception for MacOS?I have the issue from the beginning like Login step. I’m try to except the process name with any domain (*)Antigravity* antigravity* language_server_macos_armBut still can’t sign-in.

Hi folks,do you know if when setting fallback action to alert, real time policies are still evaluated when a fallback action has been triggered?Use case : you don’t want to block download when file size > 400Mo (max file size analyzed by TP)1.You set fallback action to alert2.You set a RTP allow_all_vip for a VIP group to be allowed to download and surf with no exception3.You set a RTP block_dl_400 for all users to block download with constraints file size >400Mo AND specifics files typesExpected result when download a file under 400Mo, TP is applied, all users can download. when download a file great than 400Mo, fallback action is applied, then RTP is applied regarding the user’s groupIn Real life, when standard user try to download

WSL will work on windows , This info is not mentioned in netskope site (Windows Linux Subsystem)go to WSL settings change the networking mode to “ VirtioProxy” save it then run your commands , it should work In netskope tenant , you can see the logs refer to your laptop name . 

We are trying to install the netskope clinet via IDP using the below command. But somehow it is not successful. msiexec /I NSClient.msi tenant=XXX domain=goskope.com installmode=IDP mode=peruserconfig enrollauthtoken=XXX enrollencryptiontoken=XXX (/qn - we removed the qn just ot see the live progress what is happening). With Email-Invite it is working on the same PC, but we are trying to install via IDP for bulk installation without users intervention to enter the credentials. We have configred the token at MDM distribution and also created the SAML authentication under Forward Proxy. When we see the logs and didn’t found anything resolvable. "event_details": "Installed client version 132.0.7.2513",        "actor": "System"    }}2025/11/26 11:13:04.911 stAgentSvc p155c tc24 info addonmanapi.cpp:756 addonmanapi posting client status2025/11/26 11:13:04.911 stAgentSvc p155c tc24 error addonmanapi.cpp:759 addonmanapi Post Clien

We have periodic reauthentication enabled for users, but on mobile devices, although a pop-up notification appears, users cannot view or be redirected to complete the  Periodical IdP Re-authentication to restore private app access.Is there any guidance available for this configuration?

How do I decrypt/read the TLS traffic in Advance Debug Logs while using Wireshark? 

Hello,I have a DLP policy that blocks the upload of unlabeled documents. The issue I’m facing is that when I try to upload a PPTX file that is labeled with Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MPIP), the upload is blocked by this policy.It’s important to note that not all PPTX files are blocked—only some of them.What I’ve noticed is that, for the blocked files, the “True file type” is detected as “ZIP archive.” In contrast, for files where the label is recognized and the upload is allowed, the “True file type” is shown as “Microsoft PowerPoint 2007 XML.”Has anyone encountered this problem before? Your help would be very much appreciated.Thanks, 

Hello,I am running VirtualBox in NAT mode on my machine with the Netskope Client installed on the host. The VMs inside VirtualBox are failing to connect or update due to SSL/Certificate errors caused by Netskope's inspection.I want to bypass SSL Decryption specifically for the VirtualBox application, but I do not want to bypass traffic for the whole machine or use a broad IP-based exception. Thanks.

What is currently supported to passthrough Phish-Resistant MFA methods like passkeys from unmanaged devices over Reverse proxy, universal reverse proxy and NPA browser access steering methods? We are moving to enforcing phish-resistanct MFA and need to understand what is supported and what has been tested. If this is not currently supported, is this on the roadmap or would this require the use of enterprise browser?  

Does anyone know what the “Export User Key” is used for in Netskope? This feature is located in Setting>Security Cloud Platform>User section?I could not find any documentation on the use case for this feature. I’ve attached the screenshot below.  Is there a place to store the json file once the user key is downloaded?  Thanks.  

Summary.Reviewed https://community.netskope.com/casb-swg-inline-92/netskope-inline-dlp-with-microsoft-information-protect-mip-labels-6942?tid=6942&fid=92It is clear from this article, that we could label a document Confidential, put in a DLP policy that blocks the label "Confidental" into public AI sites, and that document would be prevented (when used in appropriate specific connector situations, with possible adherence to generic connectors.But the question is - if someone were to copy and paste text from a labeled document, and directly pasted it into a prompt, would the DLP block still occur?

The recent security incident involving Salesloft has highlighted the importance of robust cybersecurity measures to counter supply chain attacks. This document provides an overview of what happened in the Salesloft supply chain attack targeting Salesforce, elaborates on what should we know about supply chain vulnerabilities, and outlines how Netskope SSPM can contribute in preventing such attacks from happening in the first place. What is Salesloft? Salesloft is a Revenue Orchestration Platform which supports the utilization of the Drift AI chat agent to integrate with corporate applications like Salesf

Team,Good morning. Is there a reason I'm getting DNS Leakage? Did I forget something in my configuration  See screenshots below.  All "DNS Traffic" is enabled in the steering configuration. DNS Profile is configured with resolver IP of 162.10.1.1 Real-Time Policy is configured. Thanks.  Expand Post

Hello Team,I am working on SSL inspection with Netskope in our organization (Bogotá, Colombia) and encountered the following issue when accessing a specific domain: Domain: jarvis.grupokonecta.co Netskope error message excerpt: IncompleteCertChain (unable to get local issuer certificate) … Blocked by SSL_INCOMPLETE_CHAIN Verification error: unable to get certificate for issuer = ‘/C=BE/O=GlobalSign nv-sa/CN=GlobalSign GCC R3 DV TLS CA 2020’, subject = ‘/CN=.grupokonecta.co’, altnames = DNS:.grupokonecta.co, DNS:grupokonecta.co’, caissuers = ‘http://secure.globalsign.com/cacert/gsgccr3dvtlsca2020.crt’, sslerrdesc = ‘unable to get local issuer certificate’ I have verified via openssl s_client -connect jarvis.grupokonecta.co:443 -servername jarvis.grupokonecta.co -showcerts and online tools such as SSL Labs, and indeed the certificate chain appears incomp

Thee following topic covering how to block Google AI mode has been posted )How to Block Google AI Mode? | Community ) but now with Google presenting poor quality AI responses via “AI Overview” on nearly all AI searches, we are looking for a way to block these search results without completely blocking Google Search.There is a known way to block “AI Overview” by appending “&udm=14” to the search request URI, however Netskope does not appear to have any support for inline modification of URI’s. Has anyone been able to work around this limitation or found another way (such as HTTP header insertion) to block the “AI Overview”? 

Hi Team, Is it possible to integrate/ install AD agent so that we can apply client configuration based on OU. and Use Entra ID integration for SSO? Just for Sign-in.  Possible that we can use OU to provide access to private resources.? One way is to create groups and provide access to private resources and apply client configuration group or all users. Since we have multiple branch offices. we need to create many Groups and import in Entra ID.  So wondering if we can enable private access based on OU and apply client configuration based on OU as well.

Does anyone have any experience with allowing Partner Access for a 3rd party? We are thinking through building out device classification rules for a potential Partner Access use-case and it got me thinking about this topic. what will we see in Devices in our tenant for these devices? I assume we won’t have any “enable”/”disable” options but want to be sure safeguarding our partner safeguarding our environment

Starting a few months ago our company users have reported consistent and numerous blocks by Google to access our own Workspace tenant apps (Google Admin, Gemini, Gdrive, etc). The message received by the users say, “Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. Please try your request again later.” It then presents your network IP and says it does not equal the Netskope POP IP (e.g. 10.10.10.10 ≠ 163.116.140.55). This implies that Google no longer trusts the Netskope POP subnets and see’s the proxied traffic as a risk. Is Netskope aware of this issue and are you working with Google to remediate it? Thanks 

It seems that users under SkopeIT are only displayed when accessing Cloud Apps or the Web.Events from Cloud Firewall or Private Apps are not included, resulting in limited visibility.Do you have any suggestions on how we can monitor user activity in these cases?

Use case: Our Support team can connect other users’ laptop with AOVPN feature but with zero Trust is blocking the admin drive access.In this user case, Support team can access the laptop CAL-XXX for Admin related activities but with Zero trust its not possible so what is the alternative solution? Is there any tool ? which can be used 

When running a query against “/api/v2/infrastructure/publishers” the list of to be returned fields can be attached. However it seems that only fields from the first level of the JSON can be selected. Does anyone know, if other fields e.g. assessment[latency], can be referenced in the field-list as well? And how? Thanks Timo

Overview Some environments using Netskope Client may encounter SSL or certificate validation issues when running Google Cloud CLI (gcloud) commands.This happens because gcloud relies on its own embedded cacert.pem bundle (under the SDK’s certifi package), which doesn’t automatically include enterprise root certificates — such as Netskope’s Root CA. Important note about bypassing *.googleapis.com In many enterprise deployments administrators add bypass rules for *.googleapis.com (so some Google APIs are sent directly to Google). However, simply configuring core/custom_ca_certs_file with only the Netskope root certificate — or relying only on the Netskope root in a custom bundle — frequently does not resolve SSL errors for these bypassed domains.Why this happens (observe