Home - The Netskope Community

Recent activity
Help others
Categories

shubhamkNetskope Partner

Next Gen SWG

Browser extensions

Dear Team, Could we manage browser extensions (including installation and execution) using NGSWG? Best Regards,Shubham

5473

11 hours ago

maxkorNew Member III

Private Access for ZTNA

Devcie classification unmanaged

Hi All, My device classification policy matches when all three criteria are met...There are a lot of users complaining that they can't access ZTNA, so I checked and they're unmanaged...I fixed it by pushing an update to the client and restarting the service/computer. It's probably not possible to do it every few days for users what is can be the root cause of pull users out from device classification policy.

1079

11 hours ago

pppNew Member

Private Access for ZTNA

Multiple policies to a single App Definition

Hello,Is this allowed to use multiple policies assigned to a single App via tags? Is it possible to predict the behavior in such a scenario?App AServer ABCTag: AApp BServer XYZTag: BApp CServer WWWTag: A, BPolicy AAllow Group AManagedClientTag: APolicy BAllow Group BManagedClientTag: BPolicy A - blockBlock allClientTag: APolicy B - blockBlock allClientTag: BUser A - member of group AUser B - member of group BUser C - member of both group A and B Will users A, B and C be able to reach server WWW?We assume that blocking policies have fewer conditions, so they are processed later.Regards

12 hours ago

maxkorNew Member III

Private Access for ZTNA

Browser access portal

Hi all,When I try to create more than one application this option is not enabled.The browser access portal does not support more than one application? I need to publish 5-6 different apps/services through the portal. How do I accomplish that?

15 hours ago

maxNew Member

Next Gen SWG

Connection closed by client nsClientUI_s1

I’m trying to determine what caused the following chain of actions:2024/11/04 16:00:22.638 stAgentSvc p14d8 tcc0 error NSCom2.cpp:1038 NSCOM2 recv failed 100542024/11/04 16:00:22.638 stAgentSvc p14d8 tcc0 error NSCom2.cpp:783 NSCOM2 startServerMessagePump: Connection closed by client nsClientUI_s1 Then further down in the logs I’m seeing: 2024/11/04 16:00:34.177 stAgentSvc p14d8 t14dc info config.cpp:10145 Config [sessId 1] Marking user config for delete2024/11/04 16:00:34.177 stAgentSvc p14d8 t14dc info npaTunnelMgr.cpp:933 CNpaTunnelMgr Handle session change for NPA active session 1, log off session 12024/11/04 16:00:34.177 stAgentSvc p14d8 t14dc info npaTunnelMgr.cpp:608 CNpaTunnelMgr Set NPA (desired) status from [NPA_TO_STOP] to [NPA_TO_STOP]2024/11/04 16:00:34.177 stAgentSvc p14d8 t14dc info tunnelMgr.cpp:1695 CTunnelMgr Disconnecting tunnel for sessId 12024/11/04 16:00:34.177 stAgentSvc p14d8 t14dc info tunnel.cpp:288 nsTunnel TLS disconnecting nsTunnel, context = NSTUNNEL_DISCO

1 day ago

asankaranNetskope Employee

Netskope Cloud Exchange (CE) v5.1 is NOW GA

Gartner Forecasts Global Security and Risk Management (SRM) Spending to Grow 14% in 2024 Worldwide end-user spending on security and risk management is projected to total $215 billion in 2024, an increase of 14.3% from 2023, according to new forecast from Gartner, Inc. The continuous adoption of cloud, continuous hybrid workforce, rapid emergence and use of generative AI (GenAI), and the evolving regulatory environment are forcing security and risk management (SRM) leaders to enhance their security and risk management spending. At the same time, they are focusing their efforts by adopting technical security capabilities that provide far greater visibility and responsiveness across the organization’s entire digital ecosystem and restructuring the way the security function operates to enable agility without compromising security. Netskope Cloud Exchange (CE) enables a collaborative ecosystem of tools and controls to secure a modern, distributed enterprise. It builds on a strategy o

670

1 day ago

fbrunnerNew Member III

DLP

Netskope SMTP Proxy - Scanning O365 Email Body contents

I have been digging through documentation but have been unable to find an answer on this specific SMTP Proxy DLP issue. We currently use Netskope DLP to cover network exfiltration and endpoints (USB, etc), and we’re testing Netskope’s SMTP Proxy DLP. For some reason, we’re unable to get Netskope to trigger on DLP violations in the message body. It always catches content in attachments, but if I paste the exact same test content in the message body (SSN, CC, etc) it fails to trigger a violation. Is this by design, or am I missing something in the config? Thanks

1 day ago

AlfaBaneExplorer III

Additional Discussions

Single mode -vs- Multi-user mode installation

Hello all,    I wanted to see if anyone had any use-case, pros/cons, intent, etc information in terms of client installations. Beyond "Optional parameter. Use this parameter when installing in a multi-user system", I've been unable to find any additional information or context.    For reference, when we deploy the client or provision devices, the Netskope client MSI is installed with a mode=peruserconfig parameter. While our devices can be used by any user in our environment with appropriate access, there are next to no devices that are intended to be regularly used by multiple users.    I just wanted to reach out and see what your experiences have been. 

12775

1 day ago

mfarisNetskope Employee

Netskope Cloud 121.0.0 Documentation Available Now!

The Netskope Cloud R121 documentation is here! New & updated articles are live on docs.netskope.com. The release notes are here: Netskope Release Notes Version 121.0.0.The key new or updated features are: Cloud Tap: General Availability (GA) of Cloud TAP Netskope Private Access (NPA): Multiple IdP Support for Browser Access Submit your feedback via docs.netskope.com.

750

2 days ago

jpiresNew Member

Next Gen SWG

Entra Conditional Access Issue

We have recently enabled conditional access in Entra and ran into a problem. Our setup says that only machines coming from one of our facilities or a Netskope IP range can access Teams, Outlook, etc.The issue we are having occurs when a user is booting up their machine, Netskope does not enable before Teams and Outlook, causing the user to have to close the apps and click Sign In until a Netskope tunnel is enabled.Is there something from the Netskope tenant we need to adjust to prevent users from having to close all of their programs each time they reboot or is this issue on the Microsoft side? We considered a GPO for preventing Teams and Outlook from booting to allow Netskope to enable as well.Any information anyone could provide would be appreciated. Thank you!

140

2 days ago

shubhamkNetskope Partner

Next Gen SWG

Browser extensions

Dear Team, Could we manage browser extensions (including installation and execution) using NGSWG? Best Regards,Shubham

5473

11 hours ago

pppNew Member

Private Access for ZTNA

Multiple policies to a single App Definition

12 hours ago

maxkorNew Member III

Private Access for ZTNA

Browser access portal

15 hours ago

maxNew Member

Next Gen SWG

Connection closed by client nsClientUI_s1

1 day ago

fbrunnerNew Member III

DLP

Netskope SMTP Proxy - Scanning O365 Email Body contents

1 day ago

jpiresNew Member

Next Gen SWG

Entra Conditional Access Issue

140

2 days ago

hshimizuNetskope Partner

Next Gen SWG

Do I get a warning if I exceed the number of registered URLs in my Netskope tenant?

Dear Everyone, The limit for URL lists per tenant is 300 K.Does anyone get an Error in the tenant UI when creating a URL List in a tenant that exceeds 300 K?If anyone has experience creating a ULR List that exceeds 300 K, it would be helpful for me.I would like to know whether tennant UI could inform it to user or not. URL List LimitsCurrently, the total URL List limit per tenant across all URL lists is 300K. The URL List limit using Regex across all URL lists in that tenant is 1K (this 1K count includes only the regex written not the expanded format).https://docs.netskope.com/en/url-list-best-practices/Thank you and Best Regards,Hiroaki.S

302

5 days ago

adebrattoNew Member

Next Gen SWG

Real-Time Protection Policy Review

Our organization must review our policies to determine if the existing policies are still valid and need to be retained. Problem we are having is that “allow” rules do not appear to log anywhere. Short of turning all “allow” rules to be “alert” rules, does anyone have a way to validation if a web access rule is actually being used and needed to be retained?

151

5 days ago

pppNew Member

Private Access for ZTNA

Problem with auto update

Hello Community,some of our clients stuck on version 114 or 117 - most updated without a problem. Has anyone encountered something similar and maybe solve it? Best regards

320

6 days ago

dinbarzilyNetskope Partner

Private Access for ZTNA

slow connection - private app

How to Troubleshoot on private app access for slow connection or unaccusable applications for users (randomly) ? We don’t have DEM advanced license .What kind of tools or options do I have in order to troubleshoot on a slow connection to private apps? I am familiar with :The NPA Troubleshooter Tool Export logs from the client when slowness for private applications occurs.

651

12 days ago

Product Forums

Explore Netskope Community Forums: Dive Into Next Gen SWG, CASB, Security Posture, ZTNA & DLP Solutions

DEM: Digital Experience Management forum

8 topics
5 Replies

Advanced Analytics

Advanced Analytics helps organizations understand and manage their exposure to cloud risks by providing a 360° view of activity throughout the Netskope platform.

Dive into the Netskope Forums Community for comprehensive discussions on cloud security, network protection, and innovative cybersecurity solutions. Connect with experts and peers to share knowledge, experiences, and best practices in safeguarding digital assets and ensuring secure cloud adoption.